← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

家庭内部不平等与家庭收入的联合征税

Intrahousehold inequality and the joint taxation of household earnings
Journal of Public Economics · 2024 · Cassiano B. Alves、Carlos E. da Costa、Felipe Lobel、Humberto Moreira

中文摘要

我们推导了夫妻家庭的最优联合所得税税制,重点区分人际不平等与家庭间不平等。家庭由两名配偶组成,二者获得家庭经济资源的机会可能并不平等。以个人为导向的功利主义通常会导致家庭目标与政府目标不一致,这一现象被Apps和Rees(1988)称为“不协调”(dissonance)。传统的ABC公式必须通过纳入一个庇古项加以修正,以纠正这种不协调。在一般条件下,不协调对边际税率的影响并不明确;其符号取决于权力较弱一方配偶对家庭收入的边际贡献,是小于还是大于她对家庭消费的边际应得份额。假定偏好具有相同的等弹性形式,多维异质性可归结为一个单一维度指标,同时保留单交叉性质。这一简化使我们能够求解Mirrlees(1971)的多维规划问题,并定量评估庇古项的大小和符号:该项在所有收入水平上均为正,从而导致更高的边际税率。

Abstract

We derive the optimal joint-income tax schedule for couples, focusing on the distinction between interpersonal and inter-household inequality. Households are composed of two spouses with possibly unequal access to the family’s economic resources. Individual-oriented utilitarianism typically leads to a misalignment between the households’ and the government’s objectives, a phenomenon termed dissonance by Apps and Rees (1988). The traditional ABC formula must be amended by including a Pigouvian term to correct for dissonance. Under general conditions, the effect of dissonance on marginal taxes is ambiguous; its sign depends on whether the less powerful spouse’s marginal contribution to household earnings is less than, or greater than, her marginal entitlement to household consumption. Assuming identical iso-elastic preferences, the multidimensional heterogeneity collapses into a single-dimensional index, preserving the single-crossing property. This simplification enables us to solve (Mirrlees, 1971)’s multidimensional program and quantitatively assess the size and sign of the Pigouvian term, which is positive across all income levels, leading to higher marginal tax rates.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →