Journal of Public Economics · 2024 · Lydia Mechtenberg、Grischa Perino、Nicolas Treich、Jean‐Robert Tyran、Stephanie W. Wang
中文摘要
本文采用两轮调查实验, 考察自我形象顾虑对投票行为的影响。我们获取选民就瑞士一项动物福利公投倡议的投票情况, 该倡议引发了涉及广泛共识性规范价值的宣传活动。我们向选民发送一条信息, 内容是支持"善良的人往往对动物友善"这一说法的科学证据。我们将该信息理解为可能改变与投票支持该倡议相关联的自我信号价值的一个因素。我们研究该信息如何影响信息的选取与加工, 以及所报告的投票行为。我们发现, 该信息在多个方面具有效果: 选民更认同支持该倡议的论点, 更倾向于预期自己会投赞成票, 并且实际报告投了赞成票的比例也确实更高。
Abstract
This paper presents a two-wave survey experiment to examine the impact of self-image concerns on voting behavior. We elicit votes on a ballot initiative on animal welfare in Switzerland that spurred campaigns involving widely shared normative values. We send a message to voters about scientific evidence supporting the claim that “good-hearted people tend to be good to animals.” We interpret this message as a factor that may alter the self-signaling value linked to voting in favor of the initiative. We investigate how this message affects selection and processing of information, as well as reported voting behavior. We find that the message is effective in several ways: voters agree more with arguments in favor of the initiative, are more likely to anticipate voting in favor, and do report having voted in favor of the initiative more often.