← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

信任与合同执行的互补性

The Complementarity Between Trust and Contract Enforcement
The Economic Journal · 2026 · Björn Bartling、Ernst Fehr、David Huffman、Nick Netzer

中文摘要

协议很少能够被完全执行,这使交易各方面临被利用的风险。在这种情况下,信任——即对他人可信度的信念——可能是实现贸易收益的关键。本文追问信任究竟是合同执行的替代品还是互补品。尽管直觉上可能认为,当执行较弱时信任更为重要,但我们的实验同时外生地变动了信任与执行,结果表明,当执行较强时信任反而可能更为重要。其机制是均衡选择:更强的执行允许存在更多的均衡,而信任有助于筛选出有效率的均衡。信任与执行之间的这种互补性具有重要的政策含义。

Abstract

Abstract Agreements are rarely fully enforceable, exposing trading parties to the risk of exploitation. In such cases, trust—defined as the belief in the trustworthiness of others—may be key to realising gains from trade. This paper asks whether trust substitutes for or complements contract enforcement. While intuition may suggest that trust matters more when enforcement is weak, our experiment, which exogenously varies both trust and enforcement, shows that it can matter more when enforcement is strong. The mechanism is equilibrium selection: stronger enforcement allows more equilibria, and trust helps select efficient ones. This complementarity between trust and enforcement has important policy implications.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →