Review of Economic Studies · 2023 · Emanuele Colonnelli、Niels Joachim Gormsen、Tim McQuade
中文摘要
我们研究了在行动者存在不完全记忆提取的情况下,对企业责任的认知如何影响政策偏好和企业沟通的有效性。我们首先利用一项关于美国公民对企业纾困支持度的新近大规模调查,证实公众要求企业在社会中表现得更好;我们将这种情绪称为“对大企业的不满”。随后,我们利用调查各部分顺序以及是否接触动画视频的随机变化表明,引导受访者思考企业责任会降低其对纾困的支持。这一发现表明,对大企业的不满会影响政策偏好。此外,我们发现,正面描绘企业责任的信息可能会“适得其反”,因为这会使公众将注意力转向一个他们持负面看法的方面。相比之下,从经济权衡的角度重新阐释企业纾困会提高对该政策的支持。我们构建了一个基于记忆的决策与沟通模型,以解释这些发现。
Abstract
Abstract We study how perceptions of corporate responsibility influence policy preferences and the effectiveness of corporate communication when agents have imperfect memory recall. Using a new large-scale survey of U.S. citizens on their support for corporate bailouts, we first establish that the public demands corporations to behave better within society, a sentiment we label “big business discontent.” Using random variation in the order of survey sections and in the exposure to animated videos, we then show that priming respondents to think about corporate responsibility lowers the support for bailouts. This finding suggests that big business discontent influences policy preferences. Furthermore, we find that messages which paint a positive picture of corporate responsibility can “backfire,” as doing so brings attention to an aspect on which the public has negative views. In contrast, reframing corporate bailouts in terms of economic tradeoffs increases support for the policy. We develop a memory-based model of decision-making and communication to rationalize these findings.