← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

老男孩俱乐部与教育精英群体的向上流动

Old Boys’ Clubs and Upward Mobility Among the Educational Elite
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2021 · Valerie Michelman、Joseph Price、Seth Zimmerman

中文摘要

本文研究排他性社会群体如何塑造向上流动,以及低地位与高地位同伴之间的互动能否促进经济与社会阶梯顶层的融合。研究场景是20世纪20年代和30年代的哈佛大学,当时新入校的各群体学生面对的是一个以排他性老男孩俱乐部为核心的社会体系。结合档案和人口普查记录,我们首先表明,来自知名私立生源中学的学生在老男孩俱乐部中占比过高,而学业成绩优异者和少数族裔则几乎完全缺席。俱乐部成员的收入比其他学生高32%,且更有可能在金融业工作并加入乡村俱乐部,而这两者都是当时精英阶层的典型特征。我们利用宿舍随机分配所产生的变异表明,接触高地位同伴会按高中类型扩大大学俱乐部成员身份、成年社会俱乐部成员身份和金融业职业方面的差距:对私立学校学生具有较大的正向效应,而对其他学生的效应为零或负向。最后,我们转向更近期的学生群体。我们发现,尽管哈佛大学的学生构成日益多元化,排他性大学俱乐部与金融业职业之间的联系在整个20世纪持续存在;来自最高收入家庭的精英大学学生也继续比其同伴获得更高收入。

Abstract

Abstract This article studies how exclusive social groups shape upward mobility and whether interactions between low- and high-status peers can integrate the top rungs of the economic and social ladders. Our setting is Harvard University in the 1920s and 1930s, where new groups of students arriving on campus encountered a social system centered on exclusive old boys’ clubs. Combining archival and census records, we first show that students from prestigious private feeder schools are overrepresented in old boys’ clubs, while academic high achievers and ethnic minorities are almost completely absent. Club members earn $32\%$ more than other students and are more likely to work in finance and join country clubs, both characteristic of the era’s elite. We use random variation in room assignment to show that exposure to high-status peers expands gaps in college club membership, adult social club membership, and finance careers by high school type, with large positive effects for private school students and zero or negative effects for others. To conclude, we turn to more recent cohorts. We show that the link between exclusive college clubs and finance careers persists across the twentieth century even as Harvard diversifies, and that elite university students from the highest-income families continue to outearn their peers.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →