← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

买方垄断势力的崛起

Monopsony Makes it Big
NBER Working Papers · 2026 · Sydnee Caldwell、Arindrajit Dube、Suresh Naidu

中文摘要

近年来,关于劳动力市场不完全竞争的文献迅速扩展。本文对这一研究领域进行梳理,重点将企业特定的(“剩余”)劳动供给弹性作为企业劳动力市场势力的定义。我们提出一个一般性框架,说明该弹性如何涵盖买方垄断势力三种被广泛研究的来源:搜寻摩擦、偏好异质性和雇主集中度。我们总结了劳动供给弹性的实证估计,并着重指出可能的异质性来源。我们强调,由于企业工资设定实践的多样性,很难从工资折价(markdown)推断弹性(反之亦然),并以买方垄断与效率工资之间的相互作用为例说明这一点。我们讨论了反垄断、劳动力市场监管、移民和宏观经济学中的政策议题如何与买方垄断相互作用,并在结尾列出若干未来研究方向。

Abstract

The literature on imperfect competition in labor markets has expanded rapidly in recent years. This article provides a guide to the field, focusing on the firm-specific ("residual") labor supply elasticity as the definition of a firm's labor market power. We present a general framework showing how this elasticity nests the three widely studied sources of monopsony power: search frictions, preference heterogeneity, and employer concentration. We summarize the empirical estimates of the elasticity of labor supply, highlighting sources of possible heterogeneity. We emphasize that it is difficult to infer elasticities from markdowns (and vice versa) due to the diversity of firm wage-setting practices, illustrating this point using the interaction between monopsony and efficiency wages. We discuss how policy issues in antitrust, labor market regulation, immigration, and macroeconomics interact with monopsony and conclude by listing several areas for future research.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →