NBER Working Papers · 2026 · Diane E. Alexander、Molly Schnell
中文摘要
本文考察美国的从医选择如何影响医生的执业风格。我们将申请医学院时的宏观经济状况作为申请者群体所受的外生冲击,发现其他高声望领域的劳动力市场低迷会增加医学院申请人数,并使入学群体的构成转向更多来自非医学预科背景的学生。值得注意的是,这些外部选择较差时期入学的群体在数十年后表现出不同的行医方式。在控制从业经验、专科和结果年份后,经济衰退时期入学的医生尽管接诊的患者更健康,但其向联邦医疗保险(Medicare)按受益人计费的金额更高——尤其是在可自由裁量、能够创收的服务上——并且更倾向于进入提供更强财务激励的执业环境。额外支出并未带来可检测到的患者健康改善。综合而言,我们的发现表明,在外部选择较弱时被吸引从医者具有更强的经济动机,也表明医学院招生未能充分甄别最终影响医生执业方式的个人特征。
Abstract
This paper examines how selection into medicine in the United States influences physician practice styles. We exploit macroeconomic conditions at the time of medical school application as an exogenous shock to the applicant pool and find that labor market downturns in other prestigious fields increase applications to medical school and shift the composition of matriculating cohorts toward students from non–pre-medical backgrounds. Strikingly, these low–outside-option cohorts practice medicine differently decades later. Conditional on experience, specialty, and outcome year, recession-cohort physicians bill Medicare more per beneficiary despite seeing healthier patients—particularly on discretionary, revenue-generating services—and sort into practice settings with higher-powered financial incentives. The additional spending does not produce detectable improvements in patient health. Taken together, our findings point to stronger financial motivation among those drawn into medicine when outside options are weak and suggest that medical school admissions screen imperfectly on the attributes that ultimately shape how physicians practice.