欧洲的劳动力市场集中度、工资与工作保障
Labor Market Concentration, Wages, and Job Security in Europe
Journal of Human Resources · 2024 · [{"name": "Andrea Bassanini", "affiliation": ["AT Sciences (United States)"]}, {"name": "Giulia Bovini", "affiliation": ["Bank of Italy"]}, {"name": "Eve Caroli", "affiliation": ["Université Paris Dauphine-PSL"]}, {"name": "Jorge Casanova Ferrando", "affiliation": ["Jorge Amado University Center"]}, {"name": "Federico Cingano", "affiliation": ["Bank of Italy"]}, {"name": "Paolo Falco", "affiliation": ["AOL (United States)"]}, {"name": "Florentino Felgueroso", "affiliation": ["Thermo Fisher Scientific (Japan)"]}, {"name": "Marcel A. K. Jansen", "affiliation": ["Universidad Autónoma de Madrid"]}, {"name": "Pedro S. Martins", "affiliation": ["İzmir University of Economics"]}, {"name": "António Melo", "affiliation": ["Department of Public Health"]}, {"name": "Michael Oberfichtner", "affiliation": ["Institut für Arbeitsmarkt und Berufsforschung", "Employment Agency"]}, {"name": "Martin Popp", "affiliation": ["University of Tennessee at Martin"]}]
中文摘要
我们利用来自六个欧洲国家的行政雇主—雇员匹配数据 (linked employer-employee data), 首次提供了关于劳动力市场集中度对工资和工作保障影响的可比跨国证据。我们发现, 各国的工资弹性惊人地相似且相对较低, 但以合同类型衡量的工作保障弹性则更大。我们提供了提示性证据表明, 我们所得工资弹性的相似性以及工作保障对劳动力市场集中度的更高敏感性, 或可由以下事实解释: 在我们研究的这些国家中, 行业 (部门) 层面的集体谈判占主导地位, 而这类谈判设定工资、却通常不设定合同类型。
Abstract
<h3>Abstract</h3> We leverage administrative linked employer-employee data from six European countries to provide the first comparable cross-country evidence on the impact of labor market concentration on wages and job security. We find strikingly similar and relatively low wage elasticities across countries, but greater elasticities for job security, as measured by contract type. We provide suggestive evidence that the similarity of our wage elasticities and the greater sensitivity of job security to labor market concentration may be explained by the fact that sector-level collective bargaining is dominant in the countries we study and that it sets wages but usually not contract type.