Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2021 · Samuel Hanson、David O. Lucca、Jonathan H. Wright
中文摘要
长期名义利率对短期利率的高频(日度或月度)变动表现出出人意料的敏感性。自2000年以来,这种高频敏感性在美国数据中进一步增强。相比之下,长期利率与短期利率低频变动(6个月或12个月期限)之间的关联在2000年之前也曾很强,但此后已大幅减弱。这一2000年之后的谜题式模式之所以出现,是因为短期利率上升会暂时抬高长期收益率中的期限溢价成分,导致长期利率对短期利率变动暂时过度反应。我们近年来观察到的长期利率随频率而变的过度敏感性,最好用一个模型来理解:在该模型中,(i)短期利率下降会触发投资者对长期债券需求的“利率放大型”转移,(ii)对这些需求转移的套利反应既有限又缓慢。我们从理论和实证两方面研究,这种利率放大型需求如何可追溯至抵押贷款再融资活动、将近期短期利率变动外推的投资者,以及在短期利率下降时“追逐收益”的投资者。我们讨论了我们的发现对事件研究方法有效性和货币政策传导的含义。
Abstract
Abstract Long-term nominal interest rates are surprisingly sensitive to high-frequency (daily or monthly) movements in short-term rates. Since 2000, this high-frequency sensitivity has grown even stronger in U.S. data. By contrast, the association between low-frequency changes (at 6- or 12-month horizons) in long- and short-term rates, which was also strong before 2000, has weakened substantially. This puzzling post-2000 pattern arises because increases in short rates temporarily raise the term premium component of long-term yields, leading long rates to temporarily overreact to changes in short rates. The frequency-dependent excess sensitivity of long-term rates that we observe in recent years is best understood using a model in which (i) declines in short rates trigger “rate-amplifying” shifts in investor demand for long-term bonds, and (ii) the arbitrage response to these demand shifts is both limited and slow. We study, theoretically and empirically, how such rate-amplifying demand can be traced to mortgage-refinancing activity, investors who extrapolate recent changes in short rates, and investors who “reach for yield” when short rates fall. We discuss the implications of our findings for the validity of event study methodologies and the transmission of monetary policy.