← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

边际工作与工作剩余:分离效率的检验

Marginal Jobs and Job Surplus: A Test of the Efficiency of Separations
Review of Economic Studies · 2022 · Simon Jäger、Benjamin Schoefer、Josef Zweimüller

中文摘要

我们提出了一种检验科斯式有效分离理论的方法。我们研究了奥地利一项针对特定年龄和地区的大规模失业救济金延长政策从推出到废除期间的一批工作岗位。在处理组中,存续至该政策期结束的工作岗位减少了18.5%。根据科斯式观点,被摧毁的边际工作具有较低的联合剩余。因此,在政策废除后,处理组中存续的工作岗位应当比不具备资格的对照组中存续的工作岗位更具韧性。然而令人惊讶的是,这两组在废除后反而表现出完全相同的分离行为。我们提出了一个替代模型,其中工资刚性驱动了无效率的分离动态,并发现了与该模型一致的启示性证据。

Abstract

Abstract We present a test of Coasean theories of efficient separations. We study a cohort of jobs from the introduction through the repeal of a large age- and region-specific unemployment benefit extension in Austria. In the treatment group, 18.5$\%$ fewer jobs survive the program period. According to the Coasean view, the destroyed marginal jobs had low joint surplus. Hence, after the repeal, the treatment survivors should be more resilient than the ineligible control group survivors. Strikingly, the two groups instead exhibit identical post-repeal separation behaviour. We provide, and find suggestive evidence consistent with, an alternative model in which wage rigidity drives the inefficient separation dynamics.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →