← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

工时约束、职业选择与性别:来自住院医师的证据

Hours Constraints, Occupational Choice, and Gender: Evidence from Medical Residents
Review of Economic Studies · 2022 · Melanie Wasserman

中文摘要

许多高薪职业所要求的长工时是否会阻碍女性进入?我通过研究2003年一项将住院医师平均每周工作时间限制在80小时以内的政策来探讨这一问题。利用涵盖全体美国医学院毕业生的数据,我发现,当某一专科减少每周工时时,进入该专科的女性会增加,而男性进入人数几乎没有变化。我提供的证据表明,女性人数的增加源于劳动供给而非劳动需求的变化。在住院医师培训项目层面,我发现基期女性占比能够预测改革后的女性进入情况。一项粗略估算表明,工时减少所引起的女性在医学专科之间的重新配置,可使医师性别工资差距缩小11%。

Abstract

Abstract Do the long work hours required by many high-paying professions inhibit the entry of women? I investigate this question by studying a 2003 policy that capped the average workweek for medical residents at 80 hours. Using data on the universe of US medical school graduates, I find that when a specialty reduces its weekly hours, more women enter the specialty, whereas there is little change in men’s entry. I provide evidence that the increase in women is due to changes in labour supply, rather than labour demand. At the residency program level, I document that baseline female representation predicts female entry after the reform. A back-of-the-envelope calculation suggests that the reallocation of women among medical specialties due to the hours reduction can close the physician gender wage gap by 11$\%$.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →