← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

向高密度地区迁移:从皇后区到金萨蒙,半个世纪的住房成本与工资溢价

Moving to density: Half a century of housing costs and wage premia from Queens to King Salmon
Journal of Public Economics · 2023 · Philip Hoxie、Daniel Shoag、Stan Veuger

中文摘要

劳动者不再迁往全国人口密度最高、生产率最高的地区,究竟是因为城市工资溢价下降,还是因为租金过高?我们在同一项实证分析中同时考察这两种解释,以评估其重要性。我们发现,如今非大学学历劳动者实际上面临计入住房成本后的城市工资折价,而受过大学教育的劳动者仍然享有显著的城市工资溢价。我们进一步考察这些发现与全国不同地区本土出生的跨州迁移者占比之间的关系,结果发现,本土出生的跨州迁移者,尤其是非大学学历劳动者,居住在生产率最高地区的可能性已经下降。

Abstract

Have workers stopped moving to the highest-density, highest-productivity places in the country because of a decline in the urban wage premium, or because the rent is too high? We analyze how important these two explanations are by studying them in one and the same empirical analysis. We find that non-college workers now effectively face a housing-inclusive urban wage penalty, while workers with college education continue to face a significant urban wage premium. We relate these findings to the share of native-born cross-state migrants across different parts of the country, and find that native-born cross-state migrants, especially non-college workers, have become less likely to live in the highest-productivity areas.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →