Journal of Public Economics · 2023 · Julien Blasco、Elvire Guillaud、Michaël Zemmour
中文摘要
消费税通常被认为是税收制度中累退性最强的组成部分。然而,由于家庭支出数据匮乏,文献中对消费税再分配影响的估计为数不多,国际比较则更为少见。我们利用家庭预算与收入调查和微观模拟,为涵盖多个国家和年份的大型面板数据提供消费税累退性的一致估计。我们提出了一种跨国估算家庭消费支出的新方法:该方法可应用于任何包含收入信息以及可能包含其他社会人口特征变量的数据集。我们强调,在住房租金数据可得时,利用该数据估算家庭消费并计算消费税,可显著提高模型的准确性。我们得到三项结果。第一,在几乎所有国家,消费税都不成比例地落在低收入家庭身上:收入最高十分位群体缴纳的消费税占其收入的比重,仅为收入处于后半部分群体相应比重的60%。第二,按扣除消费税后计算的收入不平等程度更高,而这一不平等程度的上升抵消了税收-福利制度再分配效应的三分之一。最后,各国消费税不平等效应的差异,主要由不同的隐含税率(在我们的样本中为7%至30%)所解释,而非家庭消费模式分布的差异。因此,在比较各国的收入不平等和税收-福利制度时,应将消费税纳入考量,因为再分配程度最高的制度通常也伴随着较高的消费税。
Abstract
Consumption taxes are often considered as the most regressive component of the tax system. However, there are only few estimates, and even fewer international comparisons, of the redistributive impact of consumption taxes in the literature, due to scarce data on household expenditures. We use household budget and income surveys and microsimulation to provide consistent estimates of the regressivity of consumption taxes for a large panel of countries and years. We propose a new method for imputing household consumption expenditure across countries: this can be applied to any dataset that contains income information and potentially other socio-demographic variables. We stress that using housing rents, when available, to impute household consumption and calculate consumption taxes significantly improves the accuracy of the model. We have three results. First, in almost all countries, consumption taxes fall disproportionately on low-income households: the top income decile pays a share of its income in consumption taxes that is only 60 percent of what the bottom half pays. Second, income inequality is higher when calculated after consumption taxes, and this rise in inequality offsets one-third of the redistributive effect of tax-benefit systems. Last, cross-country differences in the inequality effect of consumption taxes are mainly explained by different implicit tax rates (from 7 to 30 percent in our sample), rather than variations in the distribution of household consumption patterns. Consumption taxes should therefore be taken into account when comparing income inequality and tax-benefit systems across countries, as the most-redistributive systems generally come with high consumption taxes.