← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

气候政策存在差异时的碳边境调节、气候俱乐部与补贴竞赛

Carbon Border Adjustments, Climate Clubs, and Subsidy Races When Climate Policies Vary
Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2023 · Kimberly A. Clausing、Catherine Wolfram

中文摘要

各司法管辖区采取的气候政策在雄心水平和政策路径上均存在差异:一些地区对碳排放定价,另一些地区则补贴清洁生产。我们区分了这些不同路径所产生的两类政策溢出效应。第一,当各国的气候雄心水平不同时,搭便车者以更坚定采取行动的国家为代价而获益。第二,当各国采取不同路径时,与补贴型司法管辖区的生产者相比,施加成本的司法管辖区内的碳密集型生产者处于相对竞争劣势。碳边境调节和气候俱乐部旨在应对这些溢出效应,但当各国采取的路径存在分歧时,单一政策无法同时应对两类溢出效应。我们还考察了碳边境调节和气候俱乐部引发的政策动态;二者均有可能促进气候政策向上协调,但也伴随着风险。此外,国际竞争压力可能引发补贴竞赛,并带来相应的风险和收益。

Abstract

Jurisdictions adopt climate policies that vary in terms of both ambition and policy approach, with some pricing carbon and others subsidizing clean production. We distinguish two types of policy spillovers from these diverse approaches. First, when countries have different levels of climate ambition, free-riders benefit at the expense of more committed countries. Second, when countries pursue different approaches, carbon-intensive producers within cost-imposing jurisdictions are at a relative competitive disadvantage compared with producers in subsidizing jurisdictions. Carbon border adjustments and climate clubs respond to these spillovers, but when countries have divergent approaches, one policy alone cannot address both spillovers. We also consider the policy dynamics arising from carbon border adjustments and climate clubs; both have the potential to encourage upward harmonization of climate policy, but come with risks. Further, the pressures of international competition may result in subsidy races, with attendant risks and benefits.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →