中文摘要
The development of inclusive finance in China is distinctly characterized by fiscal support. As inclusive finance urgently needs to undergo a high-quality transition from "expanding scale and coverage" to "improving quality and effectiveness," clarifying the actual effects of fiscal support is crucial. To this end, this paper distinguishes between "scale expansion" in the sense of the direct objective and "effectiveness enhancement" in the sense of the fundamental objective of inclusive finance development, divides fiscal support into direct and indirect support, and constructs a multisector theoretical model incorporating heterogeneous demand-side agents. Based on provincial panel data from 2016 to 2023, it then identifies the effects of fiscal support from the perspective of the urban–rural income gap. The results show that direct fiscal support promotes both the "scale expansion" and "effectiveness enhancement" of inclusive finance, but its promoting effect on "scale expansion" is significantly stronger than that on "effectiveness enhancement." By improving the underlying economic and social environment, indirect fiscal support also effectively promotes both "scale expansion" and "effectiveness enhancement." Further analysis shows that incremental rewards for agriculture-related lending can strengthen financial institutions' willingness to supply, while interest subsidies for guaranteed entrepreneurial loans can unlock the demand potential of market participants; the two instruments can promote the "effectiveness enhancement" of inclusive finance from the supply side and the demand side, respectively. This paper provides a reference for deepening the conceptual foundations of inclusive finance development in China and optimizing the structure of fiscal support to advance its high-quality development.
Abstract
我国普惠金融发展具有鲜明的财政支持特征,当前普惠金融亟须实现由“增量扩面”向“提质增效”的高质量转型,厘清财政支持的实际效应至关重要。为此,本文将普惠金融发展区分为直接目标意义上的“增量”与根本目标意义上的“增效”,将财政支持划分为直接支持与间接支持,构建包含异质性需求主体的多部门理论模型,进而基于2016—2023年省级面板数据,从城乡收入差距视角识别财政支持效应。研究发现,财政直接支持既促进普惠金融“增量”又促进其“增效”,但对“增量”的促进效果显著强于“增效”;财政间接支持通过改善经济社会基础环境,亦能有效促进普惠金融“增量”与“增效”。进一步地,涉农贷款增量奖励能够强化金融机构供给意愿,创业担保贷款贴息能够释放市场主体需求潜力,二者可分别从供给端和需求端促进普惠金融“增效”。本文为深化中国普惠金融发展理念、优化财政支持结构以推动普惠金融高质量发展提供参考。