← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

论实足年龄的局限

On the Limits of Chronological Age
Annual Review of Economics · 2025 · Rainer Kotschy、David E. Bloom、Andrew Scott

中文摘要

人口老龄化分析通常以实足年龄为框架。然而,实足年龄本身未必能深刻反映衰老过程。本文回顾相关文献并开展实证分析,旨在考察:在经济行为与结果的模型中,实足年龄能否作为生理功能的可靠代理变量。我们表明,由于衰老过程在不同个体、不同健康领域以及不同时间存在明显差异,实足年龄并非生理功能的可靠代理变量。我们进一步表明,当用实足年龄替代生理功能时,它要么无法预测经济变量,要么会预测出对经济行为与结果的额外效应,而这些效应在很大程度上与生理衰老无关。继续依赖实足年龄作为生理功能的代理变量,可能会妨碍社会充分获取寿命延长所带来的益处。

Abstract

Analysis of population aging is typically framed in terms of chronological age. However, chronological age itself is not necessarily deeply informative about the aging process. This article reviews literature and conducts empirical analyses aimed at investigating whether chronological age is a reliable proxy for physiological functioning when used in models of economic behavior and outcomes. We show that chronological age is an unreliable proxy for physiological functioning due to appreciable differences in how aging unfolds across people, health domains, and over time. We further demonstrate that chronological age either fails to predict economic variables when used in lieu of physiological functioning or predicts additional effects on economic behavior and outcomes that are largely unrelated to physiological aging. Continued reliance on chronological age as a proxy for physiological functioning might impede the ability of societies to fully harness the benefits of increasing longevity.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →