← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

美元主导地位与货币政策的传导

Dollar Dominance and the Transmission of Monetary Policy
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2025 · [{"name": "Michael McLeay", "affiliation": ["Bank of England"]}, {"name": "Silvana Tenreyro", "affiliation": ["London School of Economics and Political Science"]}]

中文摘要

摘要 美元在全球贸易中的主导地位是否已使货币政策失效?一种新兴观点认为, 如果一国以美元为其出口计价, 汇率便无法稳定经济活动, 因为经典的支出转换渠道被抑制了。该观点基于这样一个前提: 出口价格以美元计价且具有粘性, 从而切断了出口需求与货币贬值之间的联系。但这一假设并未得到数据支持: 以美元定价的商品往往价格更为灵活, 同时具有更高的替代弹性。我们提出了一个假设更为现实的模型, 并表明即便存在美元定价, 通过放松货币政策使本币贬值, 仍可实质性地促进出口与经济活动。任何扩张的上限并非来自需求, 而在于供给能力。我们还表明, 汇率向美元价格的低传递并不能说明价格粘性。当需求弹性较高时, 即使价格灵活, 价格对汇率的反应也很小: 低传递是一种均衡结果, 而非名义摩擦的证据。

Abstract

Abstract Has the dominance of the dollar in global trade rendered monetary policy ineffective? An emerging view contends that if a country invoices its exports in dollars, exchange rates cannot stabilize economic activity, as the classical expenditure-switching channel is muted. This view rests on the premise that export prices are sticky in dollars, breaking the link between export demand and depreciations. But this assumption is not borne out by the data: goods priced in dollars tend to have more flexible prices, along with higher elasticities of substitution. We propose a model with more realistic assumptions and show that even with dollar pricing, depreciating the currency by loosening monetary policy can still boost exports and activity materially. The limit to any expansion is not demand, but supply capacity. We also show that low exchange rate pass-through to dollar prices is not informative about price stickiness. The price response to exchange rates is small when demand elasticities are high, even with flexible prices: low pass-through is an equilibrium result, not evidence of a nominal friction.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →