重建后南方种族暴力的政治基础
Political Foundations of Racial Violence in the Post-Reconstruction South
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2025 · [{"name": "Patrick Testa", "affiliation": ["Tulane University", "National Bureau of Economic Research", "Tula University"]}, {"name": "Jhacova Williams", "affiliation": ["American University"]}]
中文摘要
摘要 选举结果作为强有力的信号, 会以可能剧烈甚至暴力的方式塑造社会行为。本文表明, 美国南方重建之后的种族暴力, 与反黑人的民主党在总统选举中的地方表现相关联。基于总统选举中接近的得票率, 我们采用断点回归设计发现: 1880 年至 1900 年间民主党输掉普选票的南方县, 在随后四年中发生黑人私刑的可能性几乎是其他县的两倍。尽管地方公职的任职情况并未发生相应变化, 这些失利在当地精英中仍十分显眼。我们表明, 与民主党紧密结盟的南方报纸, 在民主党败选后放大了关于黑人犯罪的叙事; 而这类指控又常常被私刑暴徒所援引。这些发现指向民主党精英对种族暴力的策略性使用, 并预示了吉姆·克劳时期制度化的投票压制。
Abstract
Abstract Election results act as powerful signals, shaping social behavior in ways that can be dramatic and even violent. This article shows how racial violence in the post-Reconstruction U.S. South was tied to the local performance of the anti-Black Democratic Party in presidential elections. Using a regression discontinuity design based on close presidential vote shares, we find that Southern counties where Democrats lost the popular vote between 1880 and 1900 were nearly twice as likely to experience Black lynchings in the following four years. Despite no corresponding changes in local office holding, these defeats were salient among local elites. We show that Southern newspapers, closely aligned with the Democratic Party, amplified narratives of Black criminality in the aftermath of Democratic losses. Such accusations were, in turn, frequently invoked by lynch mobs. These findings point to the strategic use of racial violence by Democratic elites, foreshadowing the institutionalized vote suppression of Jim Crow.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →