Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2019 · Gabriel Chodorow-Reich、Gita Gopinath、Prachi Mishra、Abhinav Narayanan
中文摘要
我们分析了货币经济学史上的一个独特事件——2016年印度的“废钞”。该政策一夜之间使流通中86%的现金不再具有法定支付手段地位,并在此后数月内逐步引入新钞。我们提出了一个废钞模型,其中经济主体持有现金既是为了满足现金先行约束,也是出于逃税目的。我们利用多个新颖的数据集,基于印度各地区的横截面差异检验该模型的预测。这些数据集包括:用于因果推断的被废止钞票与新钞的地理分布数据;用于衡量包括非正规部门在内的经济活动的夜间灯光活动数据和就业调查;借记卡、信用卡及电子钱包交易数据;以及有关存款和信贷增长的银行数据。废钞冲击更为严重的地区,其经济活动相对降幅更大,采用替代性支付技术的速度更快,银行信贷增长也更低。汇总这些横截面反应可知,相对于各自的反事实路径,现金短缺导致2016年第四季度的总就业和基于夜间灯光估算的产出至少收缩2个百分点,银行信贷收缩2个百分点;这些效应在随后数月内逐渐消退。我们的分析利用一项大规模自然实验拒绝了货币中性假设,而此类证据在有关货币政策效应的浩繁文献中仍然罕见。
Abstract
Abstract We analyze a unique episode in the history of monetary economics, the 2016 Indian “demonetization.” This policy made 86% of cash in circulation illegal tender overnight, with new notes gradually introduced over the next several months. We present a model of demonetization where agents hold cash both to satisfy a cash-in-advance constraint and for tax evasion purposes. We test the predictions of the model in the cross-section of Indian districts using several novel data sets including: the geographic distribution of demonetized and new notes for causal inference; night light activity and employment surveys to measure economic activity including in the informal sector; debit/credit cards and e-wallet transactions data; and banking data on deposit and credit growth. Districts experiencing more severe demonetization had relative reductions in economic activity, faster adoption of alternative payment technologies, and lower bank credit growth. The cross-sectional responses cumulate to a contraction in aggregate employment and night lights–based output due to the the cash shortage of at least 2 percentage points and of bank credit of 2 percentage points in 2016Q4 relative to their counterfactual paths, effects that dissipate over the next few months. Our analysis rejects monetary neutrality using a large-scale natural experiment, something that is still rare in the vast literature on the effects of monetary policy.