← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

基于工具的规则与基于目标的规则

Instrument-Based versus Target-Based Rules
Review of Economic Studies · 2021 · Marina Halac、Pierre Yared

中文摘要

我们研究基于工具的规则与基于目标的规则。我们的应用场景是一个新凯恩斯主义经济体,其中中央银行掌握关于总需求冲击的不可写入契约的信息,并且无法对政策作出承诺。中央银行通过会产生社会成本的惩罚机制获得激励。基于工具的规则以中央银行可观察的政策选择作为激励条件,而基于目标的规则以通货膨胀等政策结果作为激励条件;这些结果同时取决于政策选择和已实现的冲击。我们表明,每一类规则中的最优规则均采取阈值形式,并在违反规则时施加最严厉的惩罚。当且仅当中央银行的信息足够精确时,基于目标的规则优于基于工具的规则;而且,中央银行的承诺问题越不严重,基于目标的规则相对越具吸引力。当目标阈值得到满足时,最优无约束规则会放宽对政策工具的阈值约束。

Abstract

Abstract We study rules based on instruments versus targets. Our application is a New Keynesian economy where the central bank has non-contractible information about aggregate demand shocks and cannot commit to policy. Incentives are provided to the central bank via punishment which is socially costly. Instrument-based rules condition incentives on the central bank’s observable choice of policy, whereas target-based rules condition incentives on the outcomes of policy, such as inflation, which depend on both the policy choice and realized shocks. We show that the optimal rule within each class takes a threshold form, imposing the worst punishment upon violation. Target-based rules dominate instrument-based rules if and only if the central bank’s information is sufficiently precise, and they are relatively more attractive the less severe the central bank’s commitment problem. The optimal unconstrained rule relaxes the instrument threshold whenever the target threshold is satisfied.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →