← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

还款还是拖延?发薪日贷款到期前有更多时间的影响

Time to Repay or Time to Delay? The Effect of Having More Time before a Payday Loan Is Due
American Economic Journal: Applied Economics · 2022 · Susan Payne Carter、Liu Kuan、Paige Marta Skiba、Justin Sydnor

中文摘要

我们考察了有关发薪日贷款最低期限的州法律的影响。这些法律使部分借款人能够多用一个发薪周期偿还初始贷款,而合同的其他条款保持不变。新古典模型预测,这种“宽限期”会减少借款人对高成本贷款展期的需求。然而,实际情况是,享有宽限期的借款人的还款行为与贷款期限较短的借款人非常相似,只是在时间上推迟了几周。可能的解释包括启发式还款决策和天真型当下导向。一个校准模型表明,当下导向型借款人从宽限期中获得的收益,不到时间一致型借款人所能获得收益的一半。

Abstract

We examine the effect of state laws on minimum payday loan durations that give some borrowers an additional pay cycle to repay their initial loan with no other changes to contract terms. Neoclassical models predict this “grace period” would reduce borrowers’ need for costly loan rollovers. However, in reality, borrowers’ repayment behavior with grace periods is very similar to borrowers with shorter loans, merely pushed out a few weeks. Potential explanations include heuristic repayment decisions and naïve present focus. A calibrated model suggests that present-focused borrowers get less than one-half of the benefit from a grace period that time-consistent borrowers would. (JEL G23, G51)
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →