多元化社会中的国家建设
State Building in a Diverse Society
Review of Economic Studies · 2024 · [{"name": "Ruth Carlitz", "affiliation": ["University of Amsterdam"]}, {"name": "Ameet Morjaria", "affiliation": ["Kellogg's (Canada)"]}, {"name": "Joris Mueller", "affiliation": ["National University of Singapore"]}, {"name": "Philip Osafo-Kwaako", "affiliation": ["African Center for Economic Transformation"]}]
中文摘要
多样性可能对国家建设与发展构成根本性挑战。坦桑尼亚的乌贾马(Ujamaa)政策——后殖民时期非洲规模最大的国家建设实验之一——通过将多元人口重新安置到规划村庄、并在村中对儿童实施政治教育,来应对这些挑战。我们结合各地区与各年龄段受乌贾马政策影响程度的差异,以识别该政策的长期影响。对当代调查数据的分析显示,该政策对国家认同与感知到的国家合法性具有持续的正向效应。我们更倾向的解释是,教育内容的改变驱动了上述结果;这一解释得到了考虑替代假说的相关证据的支持。我们的发现还揭示了国家建设所伴随的权衡取舍:尽管该政策有助于将新生国家确立为具有合法性的中央权威,但受乌贾马政策影响降低了民众对民主问责的诉求,且并未提升普遍化的族际信任。
Abstract
Abstract Diversity can pose fundamental challenges to state building and development. The Tanzanian Ujamaa policy—one of post-colonial Africa’s largest state-building experiments—addressed these challenges by resettling a diverse population in planned villages, where children received political education. We combine differences in exposure to Ujamaa across space and age to identify long-term impacts of the policy. Analysis of contemporary surveys shows persistent, positive effects on national identity and perceived state legitimacy. Our preferred interpretation, supported by evidence that considers alternative hypotheses, is that changes to educational content drive our results. Our findings also point to trade-offs associated with state building: while the policy contributed to establishing the new state as a legitimate central authority, exposure to Ujamaa lowered demands for democratic accountability and did not increase generalized inter-ethnic trust.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →