← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

平权行动与学校选择

Affirmative action and the choice of schools
Journal of Public Economics · 2023 · Úrsula Mello

中文摘要

在基于种族的平权行动方案引发争议之后,高等教育中基于社会经济地位的平权行动日益重要。在许多情境下,这些干预措施采用以学校为依据的筛选标准,通过与同伴比较来确定受益者。巴西实施了一项全国性配额政策,将较大比例的高等教育招生名额预留给公立学校学生。利用这项政策,我发现,该改革使从私立学校转入公立学校的转学流动增加了31%,且来自社会经济地位较低、质量较差的私立学校的学生在转学者中占比相对偏高。对机制的探索表明,转学者提高了未来接受高等教育的概率,代价是就读于更贫困、表现更差的公立学校。该改革还改变了间接受影响的同期群体的学校选择,并产生了表现为学校关闭的一般均衡效应。

Abstract

Socioeconomic-based affirmative action in higher education has gained importance following controversies over race-based alternatives. In many settings, these interventions use a school-based criterion that selects beneficiaries relative to their peers. Exploiting a nationwide quota policy in Brazil that reserved a large share of vacancies in higher education for public-school students, I show that the reform increases movements from private to public schools by 31% and that movers come disproportionately from low-SES and low-quality private schools. An exploration of the mechanisms shows that movers increase their future probability of higher education attendance at the expense of attending poorer and lower-performing public schools. The reform also leads to changes in school choice of indirectly exposed cohorts and general-equilibrium effects in the form of school closure.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →