← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

教育中的投入、激励与互补性:来自坦桑尼亚的实验证据*

Inputs, Incentives, and Complementarities in Education: Experimental Evidence from Tanzania*
Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2019 · Isaac Mbiti、Karthik Muralidharan、Mauricio Romero、Youdi Schipper、Constantine Manda、Rakesh Rajani

中文摘要

我们报告了在坦桑尼亚350所学校开展的一项大规模随机实验的结果。该实验研究了向学校提供以下支持的影响:(i)无条件拨款;(ii)基于学生表现的教师激励;(iii)同时提供上述两项支持。两年后,我们发现:(i)向学校提供拨款对学生考试成绩没有影响;(ii)一些证据表明教师激励具有正向效应;(iii)同时实施这两个项目具有统计显著的正向效应。最重要的是,我们发现了两个项目之间存在互补性的有力证据:联合实施的效应在统计上显著大于各项目单独实施的效应之和。我们的结果表明,将学校投入支出(默认政策)与改进的教师激励相结合,可能大幅提高公共教育支出的成本效益。

Abstract

Abstract We present results from a large-scale randomized experiment across 350 schools in Tanzania that studied the impact of providing schools with (i) unconditional grants, (ii) teacher incentives based on student performance, and (iii) both of the above. After two years, we find (i) no impact on student test scores from providing school grants, (ii) some evidence of positive effects from teacher incentives, and (iii) significant positive effects from providing both programs. Most important, we find strong evidence of complementarities between the programs, with the effect of joint provision being significantly greater than the sum of the individual effects. Our results suggest that combining spending on school inputs (the default policy) with improved teacher incentives could substantially increase the cost-effectiveness of public spending on education.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →