← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

水市场的流动性不足

The Illiquidity of Water Markets
Review of Economic Studies · 2026 · Javier D. Donna、José‐Antonio Espín‐Sánchez

中文摘要

我们考察在存在摩擦的情况下,市场相对于非市场制度——具体而言,拍卖相对于配额——作为配置机制的效率。我们使用西班牙东南部水市场的数据,探讨水资源配置制度的一项具体变化。一方面,贫困农户受到流动性约束,由此产生了摩擦;另一方面,属于富裕精英阶层的农户则不受流动性约束。我们利用两类农户的水需求均由作物生产函数所施加的技术约束决定这一事实,估计了一个结构性动态需求模型。这一方法使我们能够将流动性约束与未观测到的异质性区分开来。我们表明,从拍卖转向配额的制度变化提高了所考察农户的总体效率。每位农户每棵树的福利增加了23.4实际比塞塔,相当于总产出较市场配置下增加了6%。

Abstract

Abstract We investigate the efficiency of a market relative to a non-market institution—an auction relative to a quota—as allocation mechanisms in the presence of frictions. We use data from water markets in southeastern Spain and explore a specific change in the institutions to allocate water. On the one hand, frictions arose because poor farmers were liquidity constrained. On the other hand, farmers who were part of the wealthy elite were not liquidity constrained. We estimate a structural dynamic demand model by taking advantage of the fact that water demand for both types of farmers is determined by the technological constraint imposed by the crop’s production function. This approach allows us to differentiate liquidity constraints from unobserved heterogeneity. We show that the institutional change from an auction to a quota increased total efficiency for the farmers considered. Welfare increased by 23.4 real pesetas per farmer per tree, a 6 % increase in total production relative to the market.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →