← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

参照点与再分配偏好:实验证据

Reference points and redistributive preferences: Experimental evidence
Journal of Public Economics · 2022 · Jimmy Charité、Raymond Fisman、Ilyana Kuziemko、Kewei Zhang

中文摘要

我们探究个体在充当社会规划者时是否尊重他人的参照点。我们允许被试在两名匿名接受者之间,对数额不等且并非通过自身努力获得的初始禀赋进行再分配。当接受者知道自己的初始禀赋(因而可能已形成相应的参照点)时,被试进行再分配的数额比接受者不知道自己的初始禀赋时少20%;在后一种情况下,我们观察到近乎完全的再分配。这一结果在被试内比较和被试间比较中均成立,并且在多种实验设计变体下保持稳健。上述差异由广延边际反应(即完全不进行再分配,还是进行任意正数额的再分配)驱动,这进一步提示,对参照点的尊重促成了所观察到的有限再分配。

Abstract

We explore whether individuals, when acting as social planners, respect others’ reference points. We allow subjects to redistribute unequal, unearned initial endowments between two anonymous recipients. Subjects redistribute twenty percent less when recipients know their initial endowments (and thus may have formed corresponding reference points) than when the recipients do not know their initial endowments, in which case we observe near-complete redistribution. The result holds for both within- and between-subject comparisons and is robust to a number of variants in design. The extensive margin response (redistributing zero versus any amount) drives the difference, further suggesting that respect for reference points drives the observed limited redistribution.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →