The German Model of Industrial Relations: Balancing Flexibility and Collective Action
Journal of Economic Perspectives · 2022 · Simon Jäger、Shakked Noy、Benjamin Schoefer
中文摘要
本文概述劳资关系的“德国模式”,围绕该模式的两大支柱展开综述:行业层面的集体谈判和企业层面的共同决定制。与美国相比,德国将集体谈判交由行业层面进行,从而实现了更高的覆盖率,并避免了企业层面的分配冲突。与其他欧洲国家相比,德国的制度使雇主容易避开集体谈判的覆盖,或利用灵活性条款采用低于集体协议规定的标准。德国制度较大的灵活性可能减少失业,但也可能降低集体谈判覆盖率并加剧不平等。与此同时,企业层面的共同决定制通过工人在董事会中的代表参与和职工委员会,在雇主与工人之间建立合作性对话。由于工人代表的投票权占少数,董事会中的工人代表参与所产生的直接影响有限;而拥有一系列实质性权力的职工委员会可能产生更大的影响。总体而言,德国模式凸显了有助于提高效率的灵活性与有助于增进公平的集体行动之间的张力。
Abstract
We give an overview of the “German model” of industrial relations. We organize our review by focusing on the two pillars of the model: sectoral collective bargaining and firm-level codetermination. Relative to the United States, Germany outsources collective bargaining to the sectoral level, resulting in higher coverage and the avoidance of firm-level distributional conflict. Relative to other European countries, Germany makes it easy for employers to avoid coverage or use flexibility provisions to deviate downwards from collective agreements. The greater flexibility of the German system may reduce unemployment, but may also erode bargaining coverage and increase inequality. Meanwhile, firm-level codetermination through worker board representation and works councils creates cooperative dialogue between employers and workers. Board representation has few direct impacts owing to worker representatives’ minority vote share, but works councils, which hold a range of substantive powers, may be more impactful. Overall, the German model highlights tensions between efficiency-enhancing flexibility and equity-enhancing collective action.