← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

全球供应链中本地法律的局限:与采购伙伴断绝关系,还是对其“边教边贸”?

The limits of local laws in global supply chains: Cutting ties or “edutrading” procurement partners?
Journal of Development Economics · 2026 · Hendrik Keilbach、Michael Koetter、Melina Ludolph、Fabian Woebbeking

中文摘要

我们研究非上市企业的采购模式,考察这些在全球供应链中常被忽视却举足轻重的参与者,在预期将因组织边界之外的外部性而承担责任时,如何调整其采购来源。利用细粒度海关数据以及一次关于《德国供应链尽职调查法》的意外信息发布,产品层面的回归结果显示,进口企业从相关生产部门ESG相关风险较高的国家采购某类产品的概率降低3.5个百分点,这表明企业倾向于与高风险供应商切断联系。这一效应集中出现在某类产品的供应商网络较为多元化、且盈利能力较高的企业中,表明这些企业具备迅速应对预期监管压力所需的灵活性。研究结果表明,要求企业在经营决策中纳入广泛可持续性考量的强制性规定可能存在局限,对非上市企业而言尤其如此。

Abstract

We study the procurement patterns of non-listed firms and examine how these often-overlooked, yet pivotal players in global supply chains adjust their sourcing when they anticipate accountability for externalities beyond their organizational boundaries. Using granular customs data and a surprise information release about the German Supply Chain Due Diligence Act, product-level regressions reveal that importing firms are 3.5 percentage points less likely to source a product from countries where the relevant production sector exhibits elevated ESG-related risks, suggesting that firms tend to cut ties with higher-risk suppliers. The effects are concentrated among firms with well-diversified supplier networks for a product and higher profitability, suggesting they have the necessary flexibility to respond quickly to anticipated regulatory pressure. Our findings suggest that mandates requiring firms to incorporate broad sustainability considerations into their operational decisions may have limits, particularly for non-listed firms.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →