← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

族群冲突与民主的信息红利

Ethnic Conflict and the Informational Dividend of Democracy
Journal of the European Economic Association · 2023 · Jérémy Laurent‐Lucchetti、Dominic Rohner、Mathias Thoenig

中文摘要

主流民主理论聚焦于阶级冲突。与此不同,我们研究族群紧张关系比贫富分野更为突出时的民主转型,并构建了一个模型,其中:(i)各族群就经济剩余的分配进行谈判;(ii)军事动员和政治动员取决于未被观测到的族群依附强度。自由且公正的选举能够揭示信息,并恢复族群间的谈判效率。即使面临失去权力的风险,独裁者也可以理性地选择民主转型,因为选举会减少反对派的信息租金。我们框架的预测与有关去殖民化后时期民主化的、国家层面和族群层面的新面板相关性证据相一致。

Abstract

Abstract Prevailing theories of democracy focus on class conflict. In contrast, we study democratic transition when ethnic tensions are more salient than the poor/rich divide, building a model where (i) ethnic groups negotiate about allocating the economic surplus and (ii) military and political mobilizations rest on the unobserved strength of ethnic attachment. Free and fair elections elicit information and restore inter-ethnic bargaining efficiency. Autocrats can rationally choose democratic transition, even if they risk losing power, as elections reduce the opposition’s informational rent. The predictions of our framework are consistent with novel country-level and ethnic group-level panel correlational evidence on democratization in the post-decolonization period.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →