← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

咖啡闲聊?卢旺达农艺实践的扩散与市场溢出效应

Chat over coffee? Diffusion of agronomic practices and market spillovers in Rwanda
Journal of Development Economics · 2026 · [{"name": "Esther Duflo", "affiliation": ["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]}, {"name": "Daniel Keniston", "affiliation": ["Louisiana State University"]}, {"name": "Tavneet Suri", "affiliation": ["Massachusetts Institute of Technology"]}, {"name": "Céline Zipfel", "affiliation": ["Stockholm School of Economics"]}]

中文摘要

农业推广项目通常只培训部分农民,并依靠社会网络传播知识。本文通过一项针对卢旺达咖啡种植户的农艺培训项目的两阶段实验,对这一做法进行评估。第一阶段在村庄层面随机分配受训者集中度;第二阶段在村庄内部随机选取参与者。该项目提高了农民对所授技术的知识水平及其自报采用率,也重塑了农民的社会网络——新增的社会联系主要产生在共同受训者之间。乍看之下,该干预似乎具有一定效果:处理组农民的产量高于同一村庄内的对照组申请者,但这一差异在统计上并不显著。然而,知识并未真正扩散:基线时拥有更多处理组朋友的对照组农民,其经审计的采用率和投入品使用反而下降。受训者集中度较高的村庄呈现出负向溢出效应的提示性证据,这与劳动力等共享投入向处理组农民重新配置相一致;本文构建了一个简单模型将这一机制形式化,其中社会联系决定了农民对投入品的获取。这些村庄中对照组农民产量的相对下降,正是处理组与对照组差异的主要来源,这既引发了对该知识传播策略的担忧,也引发了对那些未考虑潜在负向溢出效应之估计结果的担忧。

Abstract

Agricultural extension programs often train a subset of farmers and rely on social networks for knowledge dissemination. We evaluate this approach through a two-stage experiment of an agronomy training program among Rwandan coffee farmers. The first stage randomized trainee concentration at the village level; the second randomly selected participants within villages. The program increased knowledge and self-reported adoption of the taught practices. It also reshaped farmers’ social networks by creating new social ties primarily among co-trainees. At first glance, the intervention appeared modestly effective, with treated farmers exhibiting higher yields than control applicants within the same village, although this difference is not statistically significant. However, knowledge did not diffuse, and control farmers with more treatment friends at baseline reduced audited adoption and input use. Villages with high trainee concentrations showed suggestive evidence of negative spillovers, consistent with reallocation of labor and other shared inputs toward treated farmers, as formalized in a simple model in which social ties shape access to inputs. Relative declines in the yields of control farmers in these villages account for treatment-control differences, raising concerns both about this dissemination strategy and estimates that fail to consider potential negative spillovers.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →