← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

如何最高效地改善教育成果?基于统一指标的证据综述

How to improve education outcomes most efficiently? A review of the evidence using a unified metric
Journal of Development Economics · 2024 · Noam Angrist、David K. Evans、Deon Filmer、Rachel Glennerster、Halsey Rogers、Shwetlena Sabarwal

中文摘要

许多低收入和中等收入国家在教育可及性和学生学习成果方面远远落后于高收入国家。政策制定者必须在资源有限的情况下,就应进行哪些投资以改善教育作出艰难抉择。尽管已有数百项教育干预措施经过严格评估,但比较这些评估结果仍颇具挑战。本文对有效教育项目的相关文献进行了最新且最全面的综述,其新意在于着重关注成本效益。我们分析了来自52个国家的200多项影响评估所涉及干预措施的有效性与成本效益。我们采用一个统一指标——学习调整后的受教育年限(LAYS)——将教育可及性与质量相结合,并将增益与一个绝对的跨国统一标准进行比较。研究结果识别出一些项目和政策,其成本效益相较于常规做法的优势可达一个数量级。一些最具成本效益的做法包括根据学生的学习水平而非年级进行针对性教学,以及采用结构化教学法。这些结果有助于政策制定者以大幅提高的效率改善教育成果。

Abstract

Many low- and middle-income countries lag far behind high-income countries in educational access and student learning. Policymakers must make tough choices about which investments to make to improve education with limited resources. Although hundreds of education interventions have been rigorously evaluated, making comparisons between the results is challenging. This paper provides the most recent and comprehensive review of the literature on effective education programs, with a novel emphasis on cost-effectiveness. We analyze the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions from over 200 impact evaluations across 52 countries. We use a unified measure — learning-adjusted years of schooling (LAYS) — that combines access and quality and compares gains to an absolute, cross-country standard. The results identify programs and policies that can be up to an order of magnitude more cost-effective than business-as-usual approaches. Examples of some of the most cost-effective approaches include targeting instruction to students’ learning level rather than grade as well as structured pedagogy approaches. These results can enable policymakers to improve education outcomes substantially more efficiently.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →