Quarterly Journal of Economics · 2017 · Jonathan Heathcote、Kjetil Storesletten、Giovanni L. Violante
中文摘要
税收与转移支付体系的最优累进程度由什么决定?一方面,累进税制可以抵消初始条件的不平等,并替代针对个体特有的劳动收入风险的不完善私人保险。另一方面,累进性会降低工作和技能投资的激励;当政府必须为公共品融资时,这些扭曲的代价尤为高昂。我们构建了一个便于分析求解的均衡模型,涵盖上述所有权衡。我们推导出的社会福利解析表达式,清晰地揭示了偏好、技术和市场结构参数如何影响最优累进程度。针对美国经济的校准表明,内生技能投资、灵活的劳动供给以及为政府购买融资的意愿,在限制最优累进程度方面发挥着定量上相似的作用。在贫困制约技能投资的模型版本中,最优累进程度接近美国的实际水平。基于跨国数据的实证分析为该理论提供了支持。
Abstract
Abstract What shapes the optimal degree of progressivity of the tax and transfer system? On the one hand, a progressive tax system can counteract inequality in initial conditions and substitute for imperfect private insurance against idiosyncratic earnings risk. On the other hand, progressivity reduces incentives to work and to invest in skills, distortions that are especially costly when the government must finance public goods. We develop a tractable equilibrium model that features all of these trade-offs. The analytical expressions we derive for social welfare deliver a transparent understanding of how preference, technology, and market structure parameters influence the optimal degree of progressivity. A calibration for the U.S. economy indicates that endogenous skill investment, flexible labor supply, and the desire to finance government purchases play quantitatively similar roles in limiting optimal progressivity. In a version of the model where poverty constrains skill investment, optimal progressivity is close to the U.S. value. An empirical analysis on cross-country data offers support to the theory.