Review of Economic Studies · 2020 · Diego Battistón、Jordi Blanes i Vidal、Tom Kirchmaier
中文摘要
沟通是组织不可或缺的组成部分,然而关于沟通与工人生产率之间关系的实地证据仍然稀缺。我们认为,沟通的核心作用是传递信息,帮助同事更好地完成工作。我们构建了一个简单模型,其中工人通过权衡这一收益与发送者所承担的时间成本来选择沟通量,并据此推导出一组实证预测。随后,我们利用某组织中的一个自然实验,在该组织中问题会出现,并且必须由两名工人依次处理。出于外生原因,第一名工人有时可以与同事进行面对面沟通。与我们的模型预测一致,我们发现:(1) 当可以进行面对面沟通时,第二名工人工作得更快(代价是第一名工人处理新问题的时间更少),(2) 当第二名工人更忙时,以及对于同质且位置相近的团队,这一效应更强,(3) 工人的(职业)激励决定了他们与同事沟通的程度。我们还发现,工人在其沟通决策中会部分地将社会结果内部化。我们的发现说明了团队中的工人如何根据沟通的成本与收益来调整相互沟通的量。
Abstract
Abstract Communication is integral to organizations and yet field evidence on the relation between communication and worker productivity remains scarce. We argue that a core role of communication is to transmit information that helps co-workers do their job better. We build a simple model in which workers choose the amount of communication by trading off this benefit against the time cost incurred by the sender, and use it to derive a set of empirical predictions. We then exploit a natural experiment in an organization where problems arrive and must be sequentially dealt with by two workers. For exogenous reasons, the first worker can sometimes communicate face-to-face with their colleague. Consistently with the predictions of our model, we find that: (1) the second worker works faster (at the cost of the first worker having less time to deal with incoming problems) when face-to-face communication is possible, (2) this effect is stronger when the second worker is busier and for homogenous and closely located teams, and (3) the (career) incentives of workers determine how much they communicate with their colleagues. We also find that workers partially internalise social outcomes in their communication decisions. Our findings illustrate how workers in teams adjust the amount of mutual communication to its costs and benefits.