← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

财政民粹主义与货币政策规则

Fiscal Populism and Monetary Policy Rules
NBER Working Papers · 2026 · Luis I. Jácome、Nicolás E. Magud、Samuel Pienknagura、Martín Uribe

中文摘要

我们探讨民粹主义政权、财政货币化与通货膨胀之间的历史联系,以及这些联系如何影响21世纪的货币政策。利用1960年以来大量发达经济体和新兴市场的数据,我们表明,从历史上看,左倾民粹主义政权与中央银行向中央政府提供的贷款增加存在关联;这类贷款是衡量赤字货币化的一个指标。而中央银行贷款又与通货膨胀的明显上升相关。我们表明,过去经历过依赖赤字货币化的民粹主义,会影响当今货币政策的实施。历史上经历过赤字货币化和左翼民粹主义政权的国家,对通胀预期偏离目标的反应系统性地更强。即使控制了过去通货膨胀对货币政策规则的直接影响,这一效应仍然存在。结合经验学习文献来看,这一新发现有助于理解过去民粹主义政策影响的持续性:过去的民粹主义政权依赖容易引发通胀的赤字货币化,在这些政权的阴影下运作的中央银行,如今仍需发出更强的信号,表明自身的独立性及对价格稳定的承诺,以有效锚定通胀预期。

Abstract

We explore the historical link between populist regimes, fiscal monetization, and inflation, and how these links affect monetary policy in the 21st century. Using data for a large set of advanced economies and emerging markets since 1960, we show that, historically, left-leaning populist regimes are linked to increases in central bank lending to the central government, a gauge of deficit monetization. In turn, central bank lending is associated with marked increases in inflation. We show that past exposure to populism that relied on deficit monetization affects the conduct of monetary policy today. Countries with a history of deficit monetization and left-wing populist regimes systematically respond more strongly to deviations of inflation expectations from target. This effect persists even after controlling for the direct effect of past inflation on monetary policy rules. In the context of the literature of experienced learning, this novel finding sheds light on the persistence of past populist policies—central banks operating under the shadow of past populist regimes that relied on inflation-prone deficit monetization continue today needing to send stronger signals of their independence and commitment to price stability to effectively anchor inflation expectations.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →