← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

随机检查与定期审查:最优动态监督

Random Inspections and Periodic Reviews: Optimal Dynamic Monitoring
Review of Economic Studies · 2020 · Felipe Varas、Iván Marinovic、Andrzej Skrzypacz

中文摘要

我们研究了存在道德风险的动态环境下的监督设计。代理人(例如企业)从质量声誉中获益,而委托人(例如监管者)可以通过成本高昂的检查来了解代理人的质量。监督发挥两种作用:一是激励作用,因为检查结果会影响代理人的声誉;二是信息作用,因为委托人直接看重这些信息。我们刻画了诱导完全努力的最优监督政策。当信息是委托人的主要关切时,最优监督是确定性的,并采用定期审查的形式;当提供激励是主要关切时,最优监督是随机的,且具有恒定的风险率。

Abstract

Abstract We study the design of monitoring in dynamic settings with moral hazard. An agent (e.g. a firm) benefits from reputation for quality, and a principal (e.g. a regulator) can learn the agent’s quality via costly inspections. Monitoring plays two roles: an incentive role, because outcomes of inspections affect agent’s reputation, and an informational role because the principal directly values the information. We characterize the optimal monitoring policy inducing full effort. When information is the principal’s main concern, optimal monitoring is deterministic with periodic reviews. When incentive provision is the main concern, optimal monitoring is random with a constant hazard rate.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →