← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

流动性陷阱:大萧条与大衰退的统一理论

Liquidity Traps: A Unified Theory of the Great Depression and the Great Recession
Journal of Economic Literature · 2025 · Gauti B. Eggertsson、Sergei K. Egiev

中文摘要

本文对流动性陷阱的综述将三次具有里程碑意义的经济衰退——美国大萧条、大衰退和日本长期衰退——纳入一个统一的分析框架。我们考察了驱使自然利率转为负值的各种力量:暂时性的(如银行危机和债务积压)或永久性的(如人口结构变化和不平等)。当政策利率触及零下限时,传统货币政策工具便失去效力。在标准货币政策体制下,会出现反直觉的悖论:更高的价格灵活性反而加深衰退,正向供给冲击变得具有收缩效应。我们展示了政策效应——包括财政乘数的大小、前瞻性指引以及这些悖论——如何关键性地取决于货币—财政体制以及中央银行的可信度。本文解释了体制变革(如富兰克林·D·罗斯福于1933年放弃金本位和平衡预算教条)如何通过可信地转变预期而成功扭转了深度萧条。我们考察了长期停滞力量在未来几十年是否可能显现。(JEL E32, E42, E43, E52, E62, G01, G21)

Abstract

This review of liquidity traps unifies three landmark economic downturns—the US Great Depression, the Great Recession, and Japan’s Long Recession—into a single analytical framework. We examine various forces that drive natural interest rates negative: temporarily (such as banking crises and debt overhangs) or permanently (such as demographic shifts and inequality). When policy rates hit the zero lower bound, conventional monetary tools lose traction. Under a standard monetary policy regime, counterintuitive paradoxes emerge: Greater price flexibility deepens recessions, and positive supply shocks become contractionary. We show how policy effects—including the size of fiscal multipliers, forward guidance, and these paradoxes—depend critically on the monetary-fiscal regime and on central bank credibility. The paper explains how regime changes, such as Franklin D. Roosevelt’s 1933 abandonment of the gold standard and balanced-budget dogmas, successfully reversed deep slumps by credibly shifting expectations. We examine whether secular-stagnation forces are likely to assert themselves in the coming decades.(JEL E32, E42, E43, E52, E62, G01, G21)
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →