Poor Little Rich Kids? The Role of Nature versus Nurture in Wealth and Other Economic Outcomes and Behaviours
Review of Economic Studies · 2019 · Sandra E Black、Paul J. Devereux、Petter Lundborg、Kaveh Majlesi
中文摘要
父母与子女的财富高度相关;然而,人们对于这种相关关系在多大程度上由遗传因素或环境因素决定,仍知之甚少。我们使用瑞典一个大规模被收养者样本的净财富行政数据,并将其与这些被收养者的亲生父母及养父母的同类信息相匹配。通过比较养父母及亲生父母的财富各自与被收养子女财富之间的关系,我们发现,即使在任何遗产继承发生之前,环境因素也发挥着很大的作用,而出生前因素的作用则小得多;同时,我们很少发现证据表明先天因素与后天环境的交互作用很重要。将遗赠纳入考虑后,养父母财富的作用变得强得多。我们的研究结果表明,财富的代际传递并非主要因为较富裕家庭的子女天生更有天赋或能力更强,而是因为即使在相对平等的瑞典,财富也会带来更多财富。我们还在现有文献的基础上,使用同一样本和方法考察广泛的不同结果,为理解先天因素与后天环境在代际流动中的作用提供了更全面的视角。我们发现,相较于人力资本,环境因素对储蓄和投资决策等财富相关变量的影响相对更为重要。最后,我们将消费作为福利的总体衡量指标加以研究,发现与财富一样,消费更多地由环境因素而非生物因素决定。
Abstract
Abstract Wealth is highly correlated between parents and their children; however, little is known about the extent to which these relationships are genetic or determined by environmental factors. We use administrative data on the net wealth of a large sample of Swedish adoptees merged with similar information for their biological and adoptive parents. Comparing the relationship between the wealth of adopted and biological parents and that of the adopted child, we find that, even prior to any inheritance, there is a substantial role for environment and a much smaller role for pre-birth factors and we find little evidence that nature/nurture interactions are important. When bequests are taken into account, the role of adoptive parental wealth becomes much stronger. Our findings suggest that wealth transmission is not primarily because children from wealthier families are inherently more talented or more able but that, even in relatively egalitarian Sweden, wealth begets wealth. We further build on the existing literature by providing a more comprehensive view of the role of nature and nurture on intergenerational mobility, looking at a wide range of different outcomes using a common sample and method. We find that environmental influences are relatively more important for wealth-related variables such as savings and investment decisions than for human capital. We conclude by studying consumption as an overall measure of welfare and find that, like wealth, it is more determined by environment than by biology.