Annual Review of Economics · 2024 · [{"name": "Benjamin Enke", "affiliation": ["National Bureau of Economic Research", "Harvard University Press"]}]
中文摘要
本文评述了日益增长的经济学文献,这类文献研究个体与文化之间道德边界异质性所带来的政治经济影响。所谓的“普遍主义与特殊主义”分野,已成为当代政治竞争诸多显著特征背后的主要组织原则,这些特征包括投票行为在个体层面与空间层面上的差异、富裕自由派与贫困保守派的重新结盟、意识形态的内部结构,以及政治信息传递的道德内容。一个反复出现的主题是,普遍主义对左翼政策观点和投票的解释力,远大于传统经济变量的解释力。考察普遍主义异质性的起源,一个正在形成的共识是:群体间差异在一定程度上具有经济功能,反映出道德的演化是为了支持经济生产中的合作。这一洞见统领了大量研究,阐明亲属制度、市场接触、政治制度与生态如何通过影响本地化互动与非人格化互动的相对收益,进而塑造普遍主义。
Abstract
This article reviews the growing economics literature that studies the politico-economic impacts of heterogeneity in moral boundaries across individuals and cultures. The so-called universalism-versus-particularism cleavage has emerged as a main organizing principle behind various salient features of contemporary political competition, including individual-level and spatial variation in voting, the realignment of rich liberals and poor conservatives, the internal structure of ideology, and the moral content of political messaging. A recurring theme is that the explanatory power of universalism for left-wing policy views and voting is considerably larger than that of traditional economic variables. Looking at the origins of heterogeneity in universalism, an emerging consensus is that cross-group variation is partly economically functional and reflects that morality evolved to support cooperation in economic production. This insight organizes much work on how kinship systems, market exposure, political institutions, and ecology have shaped universalism through their impacts on the relative benefits of localized and impersonal interactions.