中文摘要
本文回顾了不断增长的经济学文献,这些文献研究个人和文化之间道德边界异质性所产生的政治经济影响。所谓的普遍主义与特殊主义分野,已成为解释当代政治竞争诸多显著特征的主要组织原则,其中包括投票行为在个体层面和空间上的差异、富裕自由派与贫困保守派的重新结盟、意识形态的内部结构,以及政治传播中的道德内容。一个反复出现的主题是,普遍主义对左翼政策观点和投票行为的解释力远大于传统经济变量。就普遍主义异质性的起源而言,一项逐渐形成的共识是,群体间差异部分具有经济功能性,反映出道德的演化旨在支持经济生产中的合作。这一洞见统摄了大量相关研究,即亲属制度、市场接触、政治制度和生态环境如何通过影响地方化互动与非人格化互动的相对收益,塑造了普遍主义。
Abstract
This article reviews the growing economics literature that studies the politico-economic impacts of heterogeneity in moral boundaries across individuals and cultures. The so-called universalism-versus-particularism cleavage has emerged as a main organizing principle behind various salient features of contemporary political competition, including individual-level and spatial variation in voting, the realignment of rich liberals and poor conservatives, the internal structure of ideology, and the moral content of political messaging. A recurring theme is that the explanatory power of universalism for left-wing policy views and voting is considerably larger than that of traditional economic variables. Looking at the origins of heterogeneity in universalism, an emerging consensus is that cross-group variation is partly economically functional and reflects that morality evolved to support cooperation in economic production. This insight organizes much work on how kinship systems, market exposure, political institutions, and ecology have shaped universalism through their impacts on the relative benefits of localized and impersonal interactions.