Review of Economic Studies · 2016 · Laurent Bouton、Alessandro Lizzeri、Nicola Persico
中文摘要
本文提出了一个关于政府承担的义务总额的动态政治经济模型,重点考察债务与福利给付权利之间的相互作用。在我们的模型中,两者都是暂时掌握政治权力的群体从未来将掌握政治权力的群体那里获取资源的工具:债务使资源跨期转移;福利给付权利则直接作用于未来的资源配置。我们证明了以下结论。第一,内生福利给付权利的存在削弱了掌握政治权力的群体积累债务的激励,却导致政府承担的义务总额增加。第二,财政规则可能产生适得其反的效果:如果福利给付权利不受约束,且存在资本市场摩擦,债务上限会导致政府承担的义务总额增加,并使所有群体的境况恶化。对福利给付权利施加限制时,也有类似结论成立。第三,我们的模型为理解资本市场摩擦如何影响政府采纳财政规则和实施福利给付计划的激励提供了一些启示。最后,我们指出,偏好极化可能是债务与福利给付权利共同增长的一种解释。
Abstract
Abstract This article presents a dynamic political-economic model of total government obligations. Its focus is on the interplay between debt and entitlements. In our model, both are tools by which temporarily powerful groups can extract resources from groups that will be powerful in the future: debt transfers resources across periods; entitlements directly target the future allocation of resources. We prove the following results. First, the presence of endogenous entitlements dampens the incentives of politically powerful groups to accumulate debt, but it leads to an increase in total government obligations. Second, fiscal rules can have perverse effects: if entitlements are unconstrained, and there are capital market frictions, debt limits lead to an increase in total government obligations and to worse outcomes for all groups. Analogous results hold for entitlement limits. Third, our model sheds some lights on the influence of capital market frictions on the incentives of governments to adopt fiscal rules, and implement entitlement programs. Finally, we identify preference polarization as a possible explanation for the joint growth of debt and entitlements.