← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

央行独立性: 来自历史和机器学习的视角

Central Bank Independence: Views from History and Machine Learning
Annual Review of Economics · 2024 · [{"name": "N. Nergiz Dinçer", "affiliation": ["TED University"]}, {"name": "Barry Eichengreen", "affiliation": ["University of California, Berkeley"]}, {"name": "Joan J. Martinez", "affiliation": ["University of California, Berkeley"]}]

中文摘要

我们汇编了自 1800 年以来一套几乎完整的中央银行法规, 以评估中央银行机构的法律独立性。我们利用这些法规, 将现有的法律独立性指数在时间上向前和向后延伸。我们记录了 1980 年后独立性增强的趋势, 以及 20 世纪 20 年代较早出现的、范围更为有限的独立性增强动向。我们对现行法规应用自然语言处理, 以佐证我们基于人工阅读的评估。运用机器学习方法, 我们量化了这些法规中各项主题对独立性度量的贡献程度, 该度量基于我们对法规的阅读构建。对解释各国中央银行独立性差异具有最大正向贡献的主题, 涵盖信息披露、透明度与报告义务。具有最大负向贡献的主题则涉及对证券市场等领域的监管权力, 这些权力使中央银行的使命复杂化, 使问责更为复杂, 并使独立性成为难题。

Abstract

We assemble an almost complete set of central bank statutes since 1800 to assess the legal independence of central banking institutions. We use these to extend existing indices of legal independence backward and forward in time. We document the trend toward increased independence post 1980 as well as an earlier, more limited movement in the direction of enhanced independence in the 1920s. We apply natural language processing to current statutes to corroborate our human-reader assessment. Using machine-learning methods, we quantify the extent to which topics in those statutes contribute to the independence measure based on our reading of the statutes. The topic with the largest positive contribution to explaining the cross-country variation in central bank independence encompasses disclosure, transparency, and reporting obligations. The topic with the largest negative contribution covers regulatory powers over inter alia securities markets that complicate the central bank's mandate, make accountability more complex, and render independence problematic.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →