← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

创新具有多大的破坏性?

How Destructive Is Innovation?
Econometrica · 2019 · Daniel Garcia-Macia、Chang‐Tai Hsieh、Peter J. Klenow

中文摘要

新进入企业与在位企业都能创造新产品并替代竞争对手的产品。在位企业还能改进其现有产品。总量生产率增长中究竟有多少来自上述各条渠道?我们使用美国纵向企业数据库中1983年至2013年所有非农私营企业的数据,得出三点主要结论:第一,大部分增长似乎来自在位企业。我们依据新进入企业(定义为成立不足5年的企业)的就业份额较小作出这一推断。第二,大部分增长似乎来自对现有品种的改进而非全新品种的创造。第三,在位企业对自身产品的改进似乎比创造性破坏更重要。我们从就业创造与就业破坏的分布尾部比创造性破坏占主导地位的模型所隐含的尾部更薄这一事实中推断出这一点。

Abstract

Entrants and incumbents can create new products and displace the products of competitors. Incumbents can also improve their existing products. How much of aggregate productivity growth occurs through each of these channels? Using data from the U.S. Longitudinal Business Database on all nonfarm private businesses from 1983 to 2013, we arrive at three main conclusions: First, most growth appears to come from incumbents. We infer this from the modest employment share of entering firms (defined as those less than 5 years old). Second, most growth seems to occur through improvements of existing varieties rather than creation of brand new varieties. Third, own‐product improvements by incumbents appear to be more important than creative destruction. We infer this because the distribution of job creation and destruction has thinner tails than implied by a model with a dominant role for creative destruction.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →