The fundamental determinants of protest participation: Evidence from Hong Kong’s antiauthoritarian movement
Journal of Public Economics · 2022 · Davide Cantoni、Louis-Jonas Heizlsperger、David Y. Yang、Noam Yuchtman、Y. Jane Zhang
中文摘要
哪些基本特质与个体参与反威权抗议相关?我们开展了一系列调查以获取香港反威权运动的参与情况,覆盖的时期包含从数万人到超过一百万人参与的抗议活动。针对大学生样本,我们构建了基本经济偏好的全面画像:可能影响个体抗议参与成本的风险偏好与时间偏好;影响其收益的社会偏好。我们还获取了其他基本特质:人格、认知能力与社会经济背景。我们记录了关于抗议参与者的若干事实: 基本经济偏好,特别是风险容忍度与亲社会偏好,是抗议参与最强的预测因素; 对于温和抗议与大规模抗议,最强的预测因素相同,且在大规模抗议中效应更大; 大规模抗议的参与并非由边际类型驱动,而是由非边际类型驱动; 大学生与更广泛人群在基本偏好的分布及其与抗议参与的关系上都非常相似; 在整个样本期间,愿意诚实回答敏感调查问题的比例很高且保持稳定。我们的发现表明,经济偏好应与阶级背景和人格一并被视为驱动抗议参与的深层决定特质,并可为抗议运动动态模型的构建提供启示。
Abstract
Which fundamental traits are associated with individuals’ participation in antiauthoritarian protests? We conduct a series of surveys eliciting participation in Hong Kong’s antiauthoritarian movement, covering a period that included protests ranging from tens of thousands to over one million participants. For a sample of university students, we construct a comprehensive profile of fundamental economic preferences: risk and time preferences plausibly affecting an individual’s costs of protest participation; social preferences affecting the benefits. We also elicit other fundamental traits: personality, cognitive abilities, and socioeconomic background. We document several facts about protest participants: (i) fundamental economic preferences, particularly risk tolerance and pro-social preferences, are the strongest predictors of protest participation; (ii) the strongest predictors are the same for modest and massive protests, with larger effects for massive protests; (iii) participation in massive protests is not driven by marginal types, but rather by inframarginal types; (iv) both the distribution of fundamental preferences and their relationship with protest participation are very similar between university students and the broader population; and, (v) willingness to respond honestly to sensitive survey questions is high and stable over the entire sample period. Our findings suggest that economic preferences be considered alongside class background and personality as deeply determined traits driving protest participation and can inform the development of dynamic models of protest movements.