← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

错配的种子:埃塞俄比亚的化肥使用与玉米品种误认

The seeds of misallocation: Fertilizer use and maize varietal misidentification in Ethiopia
Journal of Development Economics · 2024 · Nils Bohr、Tim Deisemann、Douglas Gollin、Frédéric Kosmowski、Travis J. Lybbert

中文摘要

农业中的最优投入配置利用了生产互补性。例如,改良种子通常比传统种子对化肥的反应更强。因此,关于种子是否为改良种子的不准确信念,可能导致次优的化肥施用。我们利用埃塞俄比亚的数据精确记录了这一模式,该数据使我们能够将农民关于其玉米种子的信念与鉴定这些种子真实遗传特征的基因分型数据进行比较。我们发现,15%的农民错误地认为自己使用的是改良品种,其化肥使用量远高于正确认为自己播种了传统品种的农民。相反,我们发现约15%的农民错误地认为自己种植的是传统材料,其化肥使用量远低于正确认为自己种植了改良材料的农民。我们从具有全国代表性的样本进行外推,以估计由错误的种子信念导致的全国层面化肥错配的规模。

Abstract

Optimal input allocation in agriculture leverages production complementarities. For example, improved seeds are generally more responsive to fertilizer than traditional seeds. Thus, inaccurate beliefs about whether seeds are improved may result in sub-optimal fertilizer application. We document precisely this pattern using data from Ethiopia that allows us to compare farmer beliefs about their maize seeds with genotyping data that identify the true genetics of these seeds. We find that 15 percent of farmers believe incorrectly that they are using improved varieties and use far more fertilizer than farmers who correctly believe that they sowed traditional varieties. Conversely, we find that about 15 percent of farmers believe incorrectly that they are growing traditional material and use far less fertilizer than those farmers who correctly believe that they are growing improved material. We extrapolate from our nationally representative sample to estimate the national-level magnitude of fertilizer misallocation due to incorrect seed beliefs.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →