← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

设计环境卫生干预的证据

Evidence on designing sanitation interventions
Journal of Development Economics · 2024 · Britta Augsburg、Andrew Foster、Terence Johnson、Molly Lipscomb

中文摘要

政府在对市场的多种不同投入进行投资以使其更顺畅运行时面临权衡取舍,且这些投入通常由具有自身优先事项的官僚管理。其中许多市场极度依赖系统各要素的良好运转,方能达到相当高水平的均衡供给(教育、公共工程、基础设施等)。特别是在环境卫生市场中,供应链任何层面的失灵都会产生下游效应。此外,局部需求依赖于执法、教育和空间相关性。我们提出了一个关于环境卫生市场中代理人选择的最弱环节理论,该理论揭示了分散决策的困难,并提出了对政策实施的关键启示。理论表明,尽管整体环境卫生改善的福利影响是巨大的,但某一领域的增量变化对整体环境卫生供给可能几乎没有影响。我们的模型为思考环境卫生文献在政策与投资方面提供的经验教训提供了语境。

Abstract

Governments face trade-offs in investing in many different inputs to markets in an effort to make them function more smoothly, and often these inputs are managed by bureaucrats with their own priorities. Many of these markets are acutely dependent on all elements of the system functioning well in order to reach a reasonably high level of equilibrium provision (education, public works, infrastructure, etc). In sanitation markets in particular, failure at any level of the supply chain creates downstream effects. In addition, local demand depends on enforcement, education, and spatial correlation. We provide a weakest link theory of agent choices for sanitation markets that demonstrates the difficulties of decentralized decision making and suggests key implications for policy implementation. The theory demonstrates that while the welfare implications of improvements in overall sanitation are substantial, incremental changes in one area may have little to no impact on overall sanitation provision. Our model provides context for thinking about lessons the sanitation literature provides in terms of policy and investment.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →