← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

COVID-19、大学学业表现及弹性评分政策:一项纵向分析

COVID-19, college academic performance, and the flexible grading policy: A longitudinal analysis
Journal of Public Economics · 2022 · Núria Rodríguez‐Planas

中文摘要

我使用了一个涵盖2017年春季至2020年春季、超过11,000条学业记录的非平衡面板,以识别COVID-19大流行对低收入与高收入学生学业表现影响的差异。使用包含个体固定效应的双重差分模型与事件研究分析,我发现该差异效应因学生大流行前的学业表现而异。在2019年秋季累计GPA分布底端四分位的低收入学生,其2020年春季GPA高出高收入同侪9%。这一差异完全由学生对弹性评分政策的使用所解释,低收入学生选择及格/不及格选项的可能性比其同侪高35%。虽然在表现优异的低收入学生中未观察到此类GPA优势,但若不存在弹性评分政策,这些学生的GPA相对于其反事实的大流行前均值将下降5%。我发现了提示性证据,表明这种较差的表现可能是由表现优异的低收入学生在在线学习中面临更大挑战所驱动的。这些学生也报告了比高收入同侪更高比例的未完成(incomplete)成绩使用,并且对维持(基于绩点的)助学金更为担忧。

Abstract

I use an unbalanced panel of over 11,000 academic records spanning from Spring 2017 to Spring 2020 to identify the difference in effects of the COVID-19 pandemic across lower- and higher-income students’ academic performance. Using difference-in-differences models and event study analyses with individual fixed effects, I find a differential effect by students’ pre-COVID-19 academic performance. Lower-income students in the bottom quartile of the Fall 2019 cumulative GPA distribution outperformed their higher-income peers with a 9% higher Spring 2020 GPA. This differential is fully explained by students’ use of the flexible grading policy with lower-income ones being 35% more likely to exercise the pass/fail option than their counterparts. While no such GPA advantage is observed among top-performing lower-income students, in the absence of the flexible grading policy these students would have seen their GPA decrease by 5% relative to their counterfactual pre-pandemic mean. I find suggestive evidence that this lower performance may be driven by lower-income top-performing students experiencing greater challenges with online learning. These students also reported a higher use of incompletes than their higher-income peers and being more concerned about maintaining (merit-based) financial aid.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →