← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

环境政策中的效率与再分配: 农业供应链的均衡分析

Efficiency and Redistribution in Environmental Policy: An Equilibrium Analysis of Agricultural Supply Chains
Journal of Political Economy · 2025 · [{"name": "Tomás Domínguez-Iino", "affiliation": []}]

中文摘要

本文提供了一个均衡框架,用于评估贸易暴露行业中供应链不完全竞争条件下的环境政策。实证背景是南美农业部门——一个具有重大环境影响的全球农业强国。在供给侧,我考察决定排放的关键边际:农民选择毁林多少土地、选择生产哪种农产品,以及毁林与生产发生的地理位置。在需求侧,我允许供应链上存在市场势力:农民接触消费者的渠道由具有买方垄断势力的农业企业部门居中中介。鉴于最优(first-best)碳税不可行,我利用该框架评估可行的替代方案,例如对来自南美的进口品征收环境关税。除非所有贸易伙伴都对其进口加以监管,否则受监管市场实现的减排在很大程度上会被流向未受监管市场的贸易流增加所抵消。单边关税不仅无效,还在空间上具有累退的分配效应:最贫困地区(其供给最缺乏弹性)的农民通过更低的农场交货价格(farm-gate price)不成比例地承担了监管负担。最后,农业企业的市场势力进一步加剧了该政策的无效性与累退性。因此,旨在纠正单一外部性的政策可能与其他市场扭曲相互作用——不仅影响其在效率层面的表现,也影响其对剩余盈余(分配)的扭曲方式。

Abstract

This paper provides an equilibrium framework to evaluate environmental policy in trade-exposed industries with imperfectly competitive supply chains. The empirical setting is the South American agricultural sector, a global agricultural powerhouse with a major environmental impact. On the supply side, I address key margins determining emissions: how much land farmers choose to deforest, which commodity they choose to produce, and the geographic location where deforestation and production take place. On the demand side, I allow for market power along the supply chain: farmers’ access to consumers is intermediated by a monopsonistic agribusiness sector. Given the infeasibility of a first-best carbon tax, I use my framework to evaluate feasible alternatives, such as environmental tariffs on imports from South America. Unless all trading partners regulate their imports, emissions reductions achieved by regulated markets are mostly offset by increased trade flows to non-regulated markets. Apart from being ineffective, unilateral tariffs have regressive distributional effects across space, as farmers in the poorest regions, where supply is most inelastic, disproportionately bear the burden of regulation through lower farm-gate prices. Finally, agribusiness market power exacerbates the ineffectiveness and regressivity of the policy. Thus, policies aimed at correcting a single externality can interact with other market distortions—affecting their performance not only in efficiency terms, but also in how they skew the distribution of the remaining surplus.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →