← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

第三方报告的局限:来自挪威一项随机实地实验的证据

Limits to third-party reporting: Evidence from a randomized field experiment in Norway
Journal of Public Economics · 2021 · Marie Bjørneby、Annette Alstadsæter、Kjetil Elias Telle

中文摘要

只要雇主与雇员不串通逃税,第三方报告和雇主的代扣代缴就是强有力的合规机制。我们与挪威税务局合作,设计了一项包含突击现场审计的随机实地实验。将审计数据与行政登记数据进行匹配,我们提供了串通逃税的证据。我们发现,被指派接受审计的企业,其随后代表雇员申报的工资相对于被指派至对照组的企业增加了18%。这一效应在雇员较少的小企业中更为显著。我们的结果记录了第三方报告的局限性,但也表明这些局限性可以通过小规模的现场审计加以抵消。

Abstract

Third-party reporting and employers’ tax withholding are powerful compliance mechanisms, as long as the employer and employee do not collude to evade. In cooperation with the Norwegian Tax Administration we designed a randomized field experiment with unannounced on-site audits. Matching audit data to administrative registers, we provide evidence of collusive tax evasion. We find that firms assigned to be audited increased their subsequent wage reporting on behalf of their employees by 18 percent relative to firms assigned to the control group. The effect is more pronounced among small firms with few employees. Our results document limitations of third-party reporting, but also that these limitations can be counteracted by minor on-site audits.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →