← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

荷兰病还是集聚效应?现代美国自然资源繁荣的本地经济效应

Dutch Disease or Agglomeration? The Local Economic Effects of Natural Resource Booms in Modern America
Review of Economic Studies · 2017 · Hunt Allcott、Daniel E. Keniston

中文摘要

自然资源是否使生产地经济体受益,抑或存在“自然资源诅咒”,或许是因为制造业生产率溢出的挤出效应降低了长期增长?我们将油气禀赋的新数据与制造业普查微观数据相结合,估计油气繁荣如何影响美国的本地经济体。油气繁荣期间本地工资上涨,但制造业并未被挤出——事实上,该部门总体上实现了增长,由上游和本地贸易子部门驱动。可贸易制造业子部门在资源繁荣期间确实收缩,但其生产率未受影响,因此没有证据表明存在本地干中学效应的丧失。在1969–2014年的全样本中,油气禀赋多一个标准差的县,平均实际工资高约1%。总体而言,结果提供了反对美国存在自然资源诅咒的证据。

Abstract

Do natural resources benefit producer economies, or is there a “Natural Resource Curse”, perhaps as the crowd-out of manufacturing productivity spillovers reduces long-term growth? We combine new data on oil and gas endowments with Census of Manufactures microdata to estimate how oil and gas booms affect local economies in the U.S. Local wages rise during oil and gas booms, but manufacturing is not crowded out—in fact, the sector grows overall, driven by upstream and locally-traded subsectors. Tradable manufacturing subsectors do contract during resource booms, but their productivity is unaffected, so there is no evidence of foregone local learning-by-doing effects. Over the full 1969–2014 sample, a county with one standard deviation additional oil and gas endowment averaged about 1% higher real wages. Overall, the results provide evidence against a Natural Resource Curse within the U.S.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →