← ireadpaper · 顶刊中的公共政策研究

绿色政治分肥的政治化配置及其对联邦气候政策的含义

The political allocation of green pork and its implications for federal climate policy
Journal of Public Economics · 2021 · Joel R. Landry

中文摘要

本文考察同时选择排放上限并为确保关键选票而分配许可证的做法,如何影响气候政策在美国国会获得通过的能力,以及此类可行政策的条件效率与公平。当许可证被政治化配置时,国会选择上限既是为了其提供的外部收益,也是为了其所产生的私人绿色政治分肥,即许可证的价值。在气候变化等公共物品与私人物品被共同生产的情形中,立法谈判会导致政策通过与条件效率及公平之间的权衡。此外,降低投票门槛或由参议院发起气候政策,将使政策更容易受到获胜联盟意外偏离的影响。

Abstract

This paper examines how the simultaneous choice of an emissions cap and the allocation of permits to secure key votes affects the ability for climate policy to pass the U.S. Congress and the conditional efficiency and equity of such feasible policies. When permits are politically allocated, Congress selects a cap both for the external benefits it provides as well as the private green pork, or value of permits, it generates. Legislative bargaining in contexts when public and private goods are co-produced, such as climate change, induces trade-offs between policy passage and conditional efficiency and equity. Moreover, lowering the vote threshold or originating climate policy in the Senate results in a policy that is more vulnerable to unanticipated deviations in the winning coalition.
在 ireadpaper 查看全部 →