Journal of Political Economy · 2020 · Eduardo M. Azevedo、Alex Deng、José Luis Montiel Olea、Justin M. Rao、Eric Glen Weyl
中文摘要
规模庞大、因而具有统计效力的A/B测试,在商业和政策领域日益流行,用于评估潜在的创新。我们研究如何最优地利用稀缺的实验资源来筛选创新。为此,我们提出了一个用于最优实验的新框架,称之为A/B测试问题。该模型的核心洞见在于,最优的实验策略取决于大部分收益是来自典型创新,还是来自罕见且不可预测的重大成功——后者可以通过小样本测试加以识别。我们证明,如果真实效应量(先验)分布的尾部不够胖,那么尝试少数高功效实验的标准做法就是最优的。然而,当这一分布具有极胖尾部时,尝试更多但规模更小的干预这一精简实验策略则是最优的。我们利用微软必应EXP平台上的实验来测量这一尾部参数,发现其尾部极胖。我们的理论结果与实证分析表明,即便对必应内部的商业实践做出简单调整,也可能大幅提升创新生产率。
Abstract
Large and thus statistically powerful A/B tests are increasingly popular in business and policy to evaluate potential innovations. We study how to optimally use scarce experimental resources to screen innovations. To do so, we propose a new framework for optimal experimentation that we call the A/B testing problem. The key insight of the model is that the optimal experimentation strategy depends on whether most gains accrue from typical innovations, or from rare and unpredictable large successes that can be detected using tests with small samples. We show that, if the tails of the (prior) distribution of true effect sizes is not too fat, the standard approach of trying a few high-powered experiments is optimal. However, when this distribution is very fat tailed, a lean experimentation strategy of trying more but smaller interventions is optimal. We measure this tail parameter using experiments from Microsoft Bing's EXP platform and find extremely fat tails. Our theoretical results and empirical analysis suggest that even simple changes to business practices within Bing could dramatically increase innovation productivity.